Skip to Main Content

OER Faculty Roadmap

Return to Roadmap

The following formatting tools are designed to help you create or adapt OER for your own OER textbook or ancillary materials. While there are many ways to create OER, we have selected what we believe are the three best options based on the following OER creation tool criteria: 

    • Access: How easily will students be able to access the final OER material? Ensuring access is a crucial aspect of OER; a free textbook is not useful to a student if they are unable to use the materials due to technical issues or lack of access to reliable internet. 
    • Customizable: How much creative license does the creation tool support? Some OER creation platforms are highly customizable and others use software that is more automated but more constrained.
    • Ease of use: What technical knowledge is required to use the platform? Platforms differ in how much technical knowledge OER creators are expected to have to fully utilize the tool, such as HTML coding.

Recommendations

Each tool or method we have selected scored high on our ACE scale. The higher the score the better that tool performed in that category. We have provided the ACE score for each method. Our three best-practice recommendations are outlined in the tabs below. You will find more information on why we recommend these three methods as well as detailed instructions and guides on how to leverage these tools.

Word / PDF
 

Creating OER materials in Microsoft Word and then converting the Word document to a PDF has distinct advantages, especially in terms of student access. Anyone can access an open PDF from any electronic device, PDFs require minimal internet strength to download, and while an internet connection is required for the initial download, it is not required to continue accessing the document. The Word/PDF method also allows for a moderate amount of stylistic customization, although there are strict accessibility guidelines to adhere too.

One the ACE scale, the Word/PDF method scores as follows:

  • Access: Anyone can access and open a PDF from any electronic device, PDFs require minimal internet strength to download, and while an internet connection is required for the initial download, it is not required to continue accessing the document. The Word/PDF method ensures the least amount of barriers for student access. Score = 10
  • Customizable: When creating an OER content in Word you must carefully construct your content so that the document remains accessible. (i.e. Images must remain inline and cannot have wrapped text.) Word has a great deal of functionality but there are some customization limitations due to required formatting for accessibility. Additionally Word does not support HTML elements so you cannot embed videos or digital elements into the page, though you can link out to these types of resources. Score = 6
  • Ease of Use: The Word/PDF method has a moderate to advanced learning curve. To offset this learning curve the "Creating OER in Word" resource below provides a detailed guide on how to make vibrant and accessible OER word content. Score = 6

Despite some drawbacks, Microsoft Word is an excellent option for OER content, especially in terms of access. 

The key to making a good OER PDF textbook is understanding how to make your document easy to navigate and accessible in Word, so that once you convert to PDF you have an accessible document for your students. The guide below provides technical information on how to create an OER textbook in Word that will convert to an accessible PDF. The guide also details how to make special features and covers for your textbook so that the finished product is not only accessible but also highly readable and interactive. Last but not least this guide provides users with pre-made assets and style guides you can use to help jumpstart your OER creation in word.

Pressbooks

 

The benefits of using an e-text publishing platform include providing students with a reading experience that is optimized for the web, and accessibility is built into the content editor. For stylish OER e-publishing we recommend Pressbooks. Pressbooks is an open-source content management system designed for creating aesthetic digital books. It is based on WordPress, and can export content in many formats for e-books, webbooks, or print. On our Access scale, Pressbooks scores as follows:

  • Access: Pressbooks does not require a student log-in and can be accessed with a moderate internet connection. Score = 8
  • Customizable: Because it is a digital platform Pressbooks allows for HTML editing and embedding multi-media content, however the style presets cannot be highly customized, there is a moderate amount of style templates to choose from but stylistic edits are not permitted outside the template. Score = 6
  • Ease of Use: Like all e-publishing platforms there is a learning curve, but Pressbooks has easy to follow guides that will help you get to editing sooner rather than later. Score = 8

The official Pressbooks user guide outlines everything you need to know to make an OER text in Pressbooks. Adapting other OER Pressbooks for your own use is also possible. For users with PressbooksEDU or the open source Pressbooks, adapting and remixing OER is simple. Users can "clone" or copy any public, openly licensed book on the Pressbooks network to their own network. Watch the brief Pressbooks overview video below to get started. 

LibreTexts

 

LibreTexts is a powerful, online platform for all things OER – finding, storing, publishing, creating, and remixing/adapting OER, along with adding interactive elements, a homework system, and more.  The platform is organized into libraries by subject discipline and is free to use. LibreTexts is also committed to continuous accessibility improvements.

One the ACE scale, LibreTexts scores as follows:

  • Access: LibreText does not require a student log-in and can be accessed with a moderate internet connection. Score = 8
  • Customizable: In terms of HTML and muti-media content LibreTexts is extremely customizable and can support a wide variety of interactive elements. However, the style formatting is very limited, users are confined to LibreTexts singular style guide. Ultimately, we decided to give LibreTexts a high customizable score because the format is useful for a wide variety of disciplines because of its interactive element and ancillary capabilities (homework system, etc.) Score = 9
  • Ease of Use: LibreTexts has a moderate learning curve. Score = 6

The resources below are the best to help you get started with LibreTexts: 

 

Return to Roadmap